I’d be plastered all the time too if I was a judge in Whitesburg, Letcher County.
I’d be plastered all the time too if I was a judge in Whitesburg, Letcher County.
The development of ACP_196 did use AI for huge portions of the raw sequencing and simulation, for what thats worth…
Microsoft already works on nuclear stewardship + the NIF, how much worse could it possibly be?
Probably they mean the way “AI” is presented to the public / investors. Most things that claim to be “AI” aren’t, they’re just regular boring ol’ software, and even those things that do use AI are usually just using them for one tiny facet that doesn’t actually require them.
There’s potential for some incredible advances in AI right now, but outside of some novelty examples we really haven’t figured out what it’s actually useful for quite yet. It’s one of the more interesting questions in the field.
For more, check out my blog devsArentBadAtNamingThings.blogspot.tar.7z.com
Given the sounds that are produced when the overhead lights are turned on in any compsci lab, this actually seems pretty plausible…
(Not sure if I’m being whoosh’d, but just in case: “Prior art” is the legal term for a precedent that something was in use prior to being patented, and is the primary means of fighting software patent troll shit like nintendo is trying to pull here)