And probably on stage

“Furricane” where a hurricane is full of woodland creatures, is the perfect sequel schlock to “Sharknado”

Nah, Bezos wants Trump. Lower taxes, less regulation. He knows the backlash would be even worse if he forced an endorsement.

It really is all about the fuckin money.

Hey I just learned about her. Sinema 2.0!

If he bounced it through a foreign telecom/IP network, the NSA has tapes. Lordy.

You are correct, but the way people reacted is certainly conditioning from the rug-pulling enshittification going on daily in the tech world. (What are we all using instead of redis, again?)

This is a much more level take than your first comment.

They didn’t try anything. Stop inventing. Go read an actual article on the subject instead of feeding the scarebait frenzy.

“I only read the headline and the comments from the threads a week ago, I am truly disappointed in Bitwarden’s stance against FOSS as I’ve misunderstood it.”

https://youtu.be/yI4sEnIBv84?si=jLXkkmX0S5AmLpkX

As a new homeowner (god help me) - what exactly does this mean for me?

Is that the difference per bracket, or the net difference per income level? Because I think it’s the latter but I’m not sure

Ok so make it that equity in a primary residence is exempt.

Read the article, it’s literally about replacing Import/Export CSV plaintext unencrypted files with something more secure.

I.e. moving your passwords/passkeys between password managers. This is not about replacing stuff like OAuth where one service securely authorizes a user for another.

With passkeys you never need to worry about the storage method used by the site. Some sites STILL store passwords in plaintext. When that database gets hacked, it’s game over.

A public passkey, even stored in plaintext, is useless to an attacker.

Maybe that doesn’t matter for you or me, with our 64-character randomly generated passwords unique to each service, but the bigger picture is that most people just use the same password everywhere. This is how identity theft happens.

That’s exactly how passkeys work. The server never has the private key.

When a website gets hacked they only find public keys, which are useless without the private keys.

Private keys stored on a password manager are still more secure, as those services are (hopefully!) designed with security in mind from the beginning.

Only losers ask for a rematch

Because you cannot reverse a hash. Information is lost from the result.

Asheville is in the mountains