• TheSambassador@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think that this is making fun of the people who were upset at Ariel being black in the remake. The people this is making fun of don’t care about recasting race until it’s done from a white character to a black one. It’s pointing out hypocrisy.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      True, but it is not done in a very genuine way. Each role had people complaining about the changes, the only real difference is the few times a white character is casted black the movie ends up being bad anyways.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        only real difference is the few times a white character is casted black the movie ends up being bad anyways.

        Shawshank Redemption. In the source novel, Morgan Freeman’ character was a white irish guy. The reasons nobody complained were probably that a. there was no Xitter when the movie hit theaters and b. nobody knows it’s an adaptation anyway.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Same with Samuel L. Jackson playing Nick Fury or whatever The Boys is doing with characters. When the adaptation is good no one really cares.

          I have a feeling Hollywood companies intentionally do this to stir discourse and interest in the film when they know the script is weak. You never hear about these things when the movie is good, only when it’s the Ghostbusters reboot or The Little Mermaid.

          • Uruanna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            Ultimate Nick Fury came first and was openly based on SLJ, so people actually liked it.