The US presidential election remains on a knife-edge 45 days before voters go to the polls, despite Kamala Harris enjoying one of her most encouraging spells of opinion polling since becoming the Democrats’ nominee nearly two months ago.

During yet another momentous week that began with a suspected second assassination attempt against Donald Trump, the latest Guardian 10-day polling averages survey shows Harris increasing her lead to 2.6 points, 48.5% to 45.9%.

While still within error margins, that is an improvement of the 0.9% edge Harris held last week and a significant shift from the statistical dead heat of a fortnight ago before the candidates held their only scheduled televised debate in Philadelphia on 10 September.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Polls are simply educated guesses. Nobody knows for sure until the election is certified and POTUS is sworn in.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      But how do you even make an educated guess anymore? So few people answer their phone now that there’s no way you’ll get any idea.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        They use other survey methods. Go read any methodology and it will describe how they collected their data.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          But that would require learning stuff instead of spouting off whatever negative shit feels good

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They just keep going down the list until they have enough respondents to use for the data.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t think there is a list of phone numbers out there that can give you anything close to an educated guess for people under 30. They don’t even like to talk on the phone. They’d rather be texted.

          • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Polling companies have a standard number of people they need that will cover their demographic requirements (ie: age, income, location). They keep going down their list of phone numbers until those requirements are fulfilled.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              But again, how can they accurately get that in terms of opinion when so few people under 30 are willing to answer their phones? It doesn’t matter what your demographics are when you’re still restricted to the small number of people under 30 that are willing to answer their phones, making them outliers to begin with.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Their lists are millions of names long. It takes them a lot longer than it did 30 years ago, but they slog away at it until they get enough.

                • catloaf@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It’s faster. They use more methods than just calling, but the calls can be automated and the data entry digitized. (I know there are restrictions on robodialing, but I’m sure surveys have an exemption or approval process.)