• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    No no, you have a point and I agree. We admit too many viewpoints as potentially valid when these points do not agree with facts. For example, it’s ridiculous to consider the question of the existence of climate change as a topic of debate. Instead, it’s a scientific fact that human-caused climate change is having an impact on our world. To seriously consider points of view that ignore facts (outside of perhaps artistic merit) is not a productive use of our limited time.

    I do think there is some flexibility in the interpretation of facts, but to discard objective truth entirely is to me a rejection of the scientific method, and that does not lead to a desirable future for humans. It is to discard the merits of human progress in general.

    Now, lately a concerning portion of my fellow citizens have expressed that they do not fundamentally believe in improvement, but that’s another topic entirely.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s the game, always will be - objective truth exists, but rarely can we be sure we have it. It’s wrong to presume so, but the bigger issue is in giving up the chase.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Life is movement. We die when we stop moving.

        I feel this is true with humans taken together too. It’s not about being absolutely correct. It’s about believing we can learn.

        I hold out hope that there will be enough people who desire progress and knowledge that we can always keep growing and just maybe outpace greed.