• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s great but, honest question: why?

    E: LOL downvotes for asking a question. Never change Lemmy.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      We’ve spent the last few decades outsourcing key industries, where US no longer has as much manufacturing and we’re way too dependent on other countries. It took supply chain disruptions from COViD to realize how much of a bad idea that was.

      We’re finally trying to recapture some of those key jobs, industries, supply chains, dependencies, starting with chips and renewable energy. THANKS, BIDEN! this is what will make America great again

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the U.S. government gave them $6.6 billion to do it under the CHIPS Act: https://www.reuters.com/technology/tsmc-wins-66-bln-us-subsidy-arizona-chip-production-2024-04-08/

      With TSMC, it’s insurance against China invading Taiwan but Intel (and probably everyone else) got a load of subsidies too. After the chip shortage during the pandemic and Russia invading Ukraine, chip production became a national security issue.

      • PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Uhh. Who’s counterfeiting a cpu that only basically 2 factories in the world can make? Functional fakes are a thing for some really basic chips but an apple arm cpu seems like a little much.

        • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Perhaps unauthorized is a better word than counterfeit. The manufacturing process for CPUs often yields less than ideal chips. Perhaps they don’t hit the clock speed they’re supposed to, or maybe they consume too much power. Those chips are supposed to be discarded, but they often find their way to the black market. Sometimes those chips aren’t even failures. If a fab overproduces, they’re not just going to give Apple the extra chips. These are the things Apple worries about, and they view it as far less likely to happen if those chips are made in the US.

          I should also point out that the CPU isn’t the only chip that TSMC makes for Apple. Apple wants to make sure they’re getting a cut of every replacement part that gets sold. You can’t even swap screens on two brand new iPhones without Apple giving you a hard time.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            and they view it as far less likely to happen if those chips are made in the US.

            How naive.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Multiple sources of production.

      We learned during concentrating all of your production in one small country wasn’t a good idea. Plus having multiple sources has always been suggested in case anything goes wrong with one company you can still have some production.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      From a business perspective: more control over the manufacturing process and less risk of getting hit by tariffs