• febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Bit by bit, Taiwan will be slowly sold off to China once they no longer hold the last thing that made them worthy of Western protection. Of course, there will be some harsh words of condemnation, but that’s it. That’s my theory. Sad but true.

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s the reason I’m rooting for everyone, including China, to do well with domestic chipmaking. Makes everyone have little less reason to try this modern day mutually assured destruction.

  • lustyargonian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    N00b question. Do these chips get transferred from USA to India/Vietnam for assembly and then back again to all over the world for shipping?

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is HORRIBLE! I’m a Patriotic Republican and don’t know why it’s Horrible Yet but Biden did it so it’s BAD!!

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      He did it to support the rich libtards! Not the poor working Republicans can no longer afford guns to stop the immigrants. And he hates Tiaywan !

      /S

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s very impressive that they got such a modern process up and running in such a relatively short period of time. I understand the Arizona location is relatively new.

    • misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, they’re essentially doing trials where Arizona fab provides small amounts of sillicon that’s being validated against what Taiwan fab does. While it was planned for 2024 I’m guessing everyone thought it would be delayed. It’s quite a big win for US, they’re on track to secure domestic supply of fairly modern chips in case shit hits the fan in Taiwan.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        And they managed to do that with those lazy US workers? Wow.

        E: folks, pls look up TSMC bosses’ statements on American workers’ ethic

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That was Foxcon, not TSMC. And all of us have a LOT of shit in our homes made by Foxcon.

      Not that it justifies the shit Foxcon did. Just saying that Apple got a lot of flack, even though a lot of other companies should be scrutinized for their manufacturing contractor choices. Microsoft, Sony, etc.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s great but, honest question: why?

    E: LOL downvotes for asking a question. Never change Lemmy.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      We’ve spent the last few decades outsourcing key industries, where US no longer has as much manufacturing and we’re way too dependent on other countries. It took supply chain disruptions from COViD to realize how much of a bad idea that was.

      We’re finally trying to recapture some of those key jobs, industries, supply chains, dependencies, starting with chips and renewable energy. THANKS, BIDEN! this is what will make America great again

    • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the U.S. government gave them $6.6 billion to do it under the CHIPS Act: https://www.reuters.com/technology/tsmc-wins-66-bln-us-subsidy-arizona-chip-production-2024-04-08/

      With TSMC, it’s insurance against China invading Taiwan but Intel (and probably everyone else) got a load of subsidies too. After the chip shortage during the pandemic and Russia invading Ukraine, chip production became a national security issue.

      • PenisDuckCuck9001@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Uhh. Who’s counterfeiting a cpu that only basically 2 factories in the world can make? Functional fakes are a thing for some really basic chips but an apple arm cpu seems like a little much.

        • Q*Bert Reynolds@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Perhaps unauthorized is a better word than counterfeit. The manufacturing process for CPUs often yields less than ideal chips. Perhaps they don’t hit the clock speed they’re supposed to, or maybe they consume too much power. Those chips are supposed to be discarded, but they often find their way to the black market. Sometimes those chips aren’t even failures. If a fab overproduces, they’re not just going to give Apple the extra chips. These are the things Apple worries about, and they view it as far less likely to happen if those chips are made in the US.

          I should also point out that the CPU isn’t the only chip that TSMC makes for Apple. Apple wants to make sure they’re getting a cut of every replacement part that gets sold. You can’t even swap screens on two brand new iPhones without Apple giving you a hard time.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            and they view it as far less likely to happen if those chips are made in the US.

            How naive.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Multiple sources of production.

      We learned during concentrating all of your production in one small country wasn’t a good idea. Plus having multiple sources has always been suggested in case anything goes wrong with one company you can still have some production.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      From a business perspective: more control over the manufacturing process and less risk of getting hit by tariffs