• BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nah. If you post rhetoric online that might get someone killed, you get visited by the top brass. Clearly he doesn’t have to talk or let them in, but their visit lead to his posts being removed and now he knows he’s being watched and has been warned. If he posts something again like that, they may just get that warrant but now they may not need to.

    • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It seems like a case of the government intimidating and harassing a guy (who is awful, no doubt) who seems to have done nothing illegal, based on the fact that he has not been arrested or charged with any crime.

      Are we really okay with this?

      • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, I am absolutely okay with this. Violent threats and calls for murder are not protected speech, and there should be legal consequences for them. Free speech is not absolute.

        • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Right! Legal consequences; arrest the guy, charge him with something!

          But showing up to intimidate him and not arrest him? I don’t want my government doing that to me the next time I say something they don’t like.