Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 hours agoSouth Carolina executes first man in 13 years despite new evidence of innocencewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1151arrow-down13
arrow-up1148arrow-down1external-linkSouth Carolina executes first man in 13 years despite new evidence of innocencewww.theguardian.comYawweee877h444@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 hours agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·5 hours agoThe “nobody is” is the most important part to me. Like, society can argue all they want about choosing to execute convicted criminals of certain crimes. I’m not discussing that. It’s the “beyond all doubt” factor that matters most. I think we’d agree that for ~99.99999% of crimes it’s really impossible to be sure. If you can’t be sure, then there’s no reason to graduate to the next step of the decision “should we”.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 minutes agoGiving the state the power to take life from its citizens is open to abuse when the wrong person gets into power. Not allowing it in the first place is how you go towards stopping that sort of thing.
The “nobody is” is the most important part to me.
Like, society can argue all they want about choosing to execute convicted criminals of certain crimes. I’m not discussing that.
It’s the “beyond all doubt” factor that matters most. I think we’d agree that for ~99.99999% of crimes it’s really impossible to be sure.
If you can’t be sure, then there’s no reason to graduate to the next step of the decision “should we”.
Giving the state the power to take life from its citizens is open to abuse when the wrong person gets into power. Not allowing it in the first place is how you go towards stopping that sort of thing.