• UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have NODE installed using snap lmao. Why? Installing it the normal way just gives me tons of errors that I’m too bored to deal with. I’m sure there’s a fix, but I’m too lazy to debug all that. Of course, I don’t use snap node for hosting servers and stuff. I just use it for react native. Regardless, it works n I’m happy lol

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah. I don’t mind snap at all for cases where a better package doesn’t exist.

      What made me give up Ubuntu was how it railroaded me into snap versions of packages that work better, for me, as native .deb installs.

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Oh definitely. Canonical forcing us to use snap Firefox was very shitty. I mean I still use Ubuntu because I’m lazy, but I did change the snap Firefox thing to the apt libraries or whatever.

        I really don’t understand why they don’t just adopt flatpak.

        • lengau@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          43 minutes ago

          I don’t believe Flatpak has the ability to package something like node. It certainly can’t package kernels or system services (at least not without leaving the user with a ton of manual work to do that would make it not much better than getting a tarball).