• Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s a shame that snaps are forced to use Canonicals closed source backend because they are really good, and a fully snap system is a very compelling idea for immutable systems

    • lengau@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They’re not forced to do so. You can install snaps locally (or provide a distribution system that treats snapd much the way apt treats dpkg), or you can point snapd at a different store. The snap store API is open and documented, and for a while there was even a separate snap store project. It seems to have died out because despite people’s contention about Canonical’s snap store, they didn’t actually actually want to run their own snap stores.

      • Morphit @feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted. It makes perfect sense that Cannonical made it’s own proprietary package ecosystem and while technically anyone can build their own snap store, ain’t nobody got time for that.

        • lengau@midwest.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Because people who just want their daily Two Minutes’ Hate rather than actually having nuanced takes.