I don’t think it’s a failure to communicate. I think it’s a case of you injecting your agenda where it doesn’t apply because you want a soapbox to stand on. That is off-putting and alienating. Chime in with your spiel when it’s appropriate to the context. Police protecting me has nothing to do with presidential succession and it’s weird to bring it up in that context.
In another context I might well agree with you, but right now it feels like an attempt to redirect to make this about your agenda. You don’t need me for that.
I don’t think it’s a failure to communicate. I think it’s a case of you injecting your agenda where it doesn’t apply because you want a soapbox to stand on. That is off-putting and alienating. Chime in with your spiel when it’s appropriate to the context. Police protecting me has nothing to do with presidential succession and it’s weird to bring it up in that context.
In another context I might well agree with you, but right now it feels like an attempt to redirect to make this about your agenda. You don’t need me for that.
I see. Anything you don’t like is an “agenda” warranting ad hominem.
Recognize that you are trying to make a social point as you socially flail.
Silly goose. You don’t know what you’re talking about. But please do be armed and ready! I appreciate that much.