• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i would really appreciate it if a stats/math nerd would put together a short piece on how “statistically it only makes sense if the Egyptians built a pyramid, this is the most logical and likely outcome”

    i feel like you could argue that statistically, shapes that are to be built by humans, will inevitably approach the shape of a pyramid.

    • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s more due to engineering. Materials have limited strength. Stone has fairly good compressive strength, but it’ll still crack if you put too much weight on it. If you use your stone to make a tower, it won’t get very high before it topples over. If you instead build a pyramid, the weight of the stone on top is dispersed across several stones below it and those stones disperse their weight to multiple stones and so on down to the base, letting you build far taller.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        this is true, regardless, i’m still sure it’s somewhat relevant. human societies have built a lot of large structures, but the pyramids are some of the largest ever.

    • fossilesque@mander.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Take a handful of sand. Turn your first perpendicular to the ground and let it fall slowly. What shape does it form? It’s one of the most stable shapes you can make.