• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That’s not what was said though. I was saying that it was a PUBLIC forum. I’m not stating WHAT is being said. Merely that it’s being said in a public way.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I don’t think I would agree that just because something is public that it’s a public forum. I feel like the public has to own it as well. I looked it up and maybe it’s because I predate social media by rather a lot, but I think of it in the classical sense:

      Public forums are typically categorized into three types:

      1. Traditional Public Forums: Long-established spaces like parks or sidewalks, where people have historically exercised their rights to free speech and assembly.
      2. Designated Public Forums: Areas that the government intentionally opens up for public expression, such as town halls or school meeting rooms.
      3. Limited Public Forums: Spaces opened for specific types of discussions or activities but with certain restrictions on the subject matter or participants.

      The important factor being public ownership of the forum. I will concede that it has colloquially come to include public social media, but I think it’s important to distinguish that it’s not really the same thing at all as has been discussed through most of our history.

      Food for thought. I just think calling them public forums attaches too much importance to a profit seeking endeavor.

      • ulkesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Exactly. You were much more articulate than I, with my comparison, but it was effectively the point I was trying to make — it’s not a public forum at all and it’s now overrun by a cesspool of nonsensical garbage.