• SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I have something like this, but it’s for game boy.

    Also utterly worthless; it distorts the picture in uncomfortable ways, and honestly was a much worse experience than just using the screen.

    It’s also only a couple inches bigger, so dumb.

    • PunchingWood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      You mean one of those bad boys with foldable zoom lens and light attachment that ate like 4 AAA batteries?

      I still have one of those here, thing was amazing to play in the dark lol

      Edit, this the one I mean, slightly different model but same chonky boy

    • sploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had one for my Game Gear that added more than few inches to the handheld’s depth, but did a decent job of semi-rectilinearly magnifying the screen. The backlight probably helped, since it wasn’t relying on light bounding in through the lens and then back out.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s a pretty accurate summation of gaming in general in the 80s. The art in the book was nearly always better than the gameplay for lots of games.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You needed something to convince gamers it was worth buying. Note the awesome art doesn’t actually give any sort of realistic idea of what the product was like.