• classic@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    31 minutes ago

    Crap. If I hope this doesn’t mean motion sickness inducing shaky cam filming

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m glad they mentioned the release dates in the article because for a second there I was about to look up when “28 Weeks Later” came out to see if this mad lad waited 28 years to make the next movie. It came out in 2007 so it’s been 17 years. For some reason I felt like it was so much older than I remember, but it would have come out when I was a toddler if they did release it 28 years ago.

    … Anyway. I’m stoked to see the movie.

    • dunz@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The first in the series, 28 Days Later, came out in 2002 actually

      • TommySoda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        True. I was comparing it to the second for some reason. But still, only 22 years and I’m just dumb. :)

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is this a big deal? Tons of movies have been shot with consumer camcorders which are probably worse than a modern phone camera.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Boyle is probably the biggest name to hop on the digital hype train early on, so this isn’t super shocking.