Well, that’s awesome.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Generative AI has polluted the data,” she wrote. “I don’t think anyone has reliable information about post-2021 language usage by humans.”

    That is fucking horrifying.

    • Zikeji@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, the generative AI pollution feels alot like the whole steel thing - since the nuclear tests it’s been impossible for new steel to not be slightly radioactive, which means if they need uncontaminated steel they get it from ships that sunk before those.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tie this with the obvious oil pollution, and newly musks radio transmission pollution… Fucking corporations get to pollute the world in every way imaginable to chase a buck and we’re left having to cope with their waste…

    Fucking bullshit society we made for ourselves…

  • cybervseas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    That makes sense. Way too many web search results look and feel like they weren’t written by a human lately. It’s gotten even more difficult for me to figure out what’s trustworthy and what isn’t.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      When the first three results look like high schoolers copied with slight wording changes from the same source and they are all written in an extremely passive tone, my assumption is AI. Questions on things like cooking temps are the worst in my experience, and I assume that is something which is easy to automate.

      • cybervseas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was looking for tips on cutting acrylic sheets and everything I found seemed untrustworthy. Bad advice there could be hazardous.