Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up1688arrow-down18
arrow-up1680arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·7 hours agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 hours agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.