• Fox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Your math for California is off by a factor of ten. California’s per-capita electoral votes would be 0.00000141025

    There’s a minimum representation of votes (3) for statehood. In Alaska’s case there are a large number of natives who are directly affected by policy at the federal level. The state is also very important strategically for defense and energy production.

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In Alaska’s case there are a large number of natives who are directly affected by policy at the federal level. The state is also very important strategically for defense and energy production.

      Can anyone explain how this would be relevant?

      • Fox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        Well you’re replying to me, so I’ll take a crack at it. The whole purpose of the federal government is to represent the states, and the intention of the electoral colleges is to balance their interests. If the national popular vote was the only thing that mattered, there would be almost no reason for candidates to care about policy issues that uniquely affect states with smaller populations like Alaska.