• PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Ex-Fucking-Scuse me?

    Part of the enhanced background check requires requesting records from state and local law enforcement and mental health repositories about potential purchasers under 21.

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If used properly this is a good thing. You don’t want someone who suffers from psychosis or some manic disorders with a firearm.

      Obviously it really depends how it is implemented.

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Can confirm, it does. Not for firearms, just for “who knows what other rights I’ll lose in 30 years if I’m on that list.”

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          If I have to live somewhere where people can own deadly weapons. It absolutely is in the public interest to try and minimise the chances of something going wrong.

          Health records are checked when applying for social security, for immigration, for insurance. I don’t necessarily agree with the fact they are for these things. But in my ideal world. The public’s right to safety comes before the right of someone to own a deadly weapon. And if they are going to do a background check they might aswell check for conditions which increase risk of fatal firearm use.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Inability to respect the rights of others is a red flag that you have psychopathic tendencies. Please report to the nearest euthanasia center.

            • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              In my opinion no one should have the right to own a firearm. But since that’s impossible in america, I’m all for restricting it.

              I’m not allowed to purchase a firearm in my country because I have a disability that often causes fainting and seizures.

              • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                America has a gun problem and they are going to start blaming people who have sought medical treatment (for the children). They aren’t going to go after people who should probably have medical treatment for mental illness through rigorous screening. These kinds of policies cause people to hesitate when they should seek mental healthcare. A big example is police. They are afraid to ask help because they could lose their job. It’s a bullshit policy that does nothing to help the situation and puts blame on people who aren’t the problem.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Welcome to “bigotry 101”…o it says your trans here…denied…o you have adhd…denied… depression…denied…ptsd from a previous rape…denied.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        this becomes a tunable matter to vote around. Dangle it in front of the aristocracy so they support it and then chip it away with rights.