• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Wanna know why prices everywhere went up so much? They had to pay all the advertising companies for the billions of ads they’ve been trying to force us to watch everywhere, from tv to internet to roadside billboards. So the consumer had to pay.

    (No, not really, but it sure feels that way)

  • theredbit@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Unfortunately, it may be difficult to do much without some kind of intervention at a larger scale (i.e. government intervention) but so much money is made from these ads. Money talks. There are also people who don’t know about ad blockers or simply don’t care to run one.

    I do agree with one comment below of static advertisements to promote a product or service . It reminds me something like tv commercials. The targeted ones is just asking for trouble for your privacy and getting scammed.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I still think targeted ads should be illegal. I would accept static ads that are based on the content of the site rather than me as a compromise.

    So like if I’m looking at example.com/cool-bikes you can show me bike ads. You don’t need to know who I am or track me.

    It’s good enough for the past few decades (centuries?) it’s good enough for now. The Superbowl doesn’t serve a different ad to every viewer.

    • stellargmite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And targetted ads aren’t that much more effective than context based. So the internet has been compromised, misinformation has run rife, and platforms hijacked to threaten democratic nations so some corporations can have 6% more effective advertising. What a deal. I believe thats the approx effectiveness difference.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

    It indiscriminately pollutes the environments it’s projected in to, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising the mass hoarding of personal information which is uneconomical to appropriately secure.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t people use ad blockers? If not, learn how to use one instead to complain.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Garbage ads have been a thing almost since the dawn of the Internet and we found a solution to them years ago. They’re called ad blockers. If you are online and not using an ad blocker: Why? That’s like finding a $2/night hooker and not using a condom.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Firefox plus uBlock Origin is what you can do about it. I hardly ever see any ads. SponsorBlock is great if you watch youtube too.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    For example, Google Chrome has stopped the use of auto-play video.

    Even setting aside ads, that was virtually always something that I did not want.

    If websites like CNN want someone to watch video, put the video up with autoplay off. If someone wants to watch it, they can start it playing.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      But then they can’t force you to watch claim that you watched the ad at the start of the video for that sweet advertiser revenue.