• Engywuck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Everybody knows that Chrome, the only browser made by Google, has a built-in adblocker. /s

    Being called names just for stating the obvious. Typical lemmy.

    It’s not my fault if Mozilla won’t bother implementing a decent adblocker and have to rely on an external unpaid developer to keep FF afloat.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Firefox is a browser, not an adblocker. Why would they make their own adblocker when there are already independent adblockers that are very good? I would suggest Firefox just come pre-installed with uBlock Origin

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        “Firefox is a browser, not an ad measurement tool. What would they sneakily introduce an OPT-OUT ad efficacy measurement tool”?

        People would really do anything to justify Mozilla’s bullshit.