• Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Everybody knows that Chrome, the only browser made by Google, has a built-in adblocker. /s

      Being called names just for stating the obvious. Typical lemmy.

      It’s not my fault if Mozilla won’t bother implementing a decent adblocker and have to rely on an external unpaid developer to keep FF afloat.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Firefox is a browser, not an adblocker. Why would they make their own adblocker when there are already independent adblockers that are very good? I would suggest Firefox just come pre-installed with uBlock Origin

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          “Firefox is a browser, not an ad measurement tool. What would they sneakily introduce an OPT-OUT ad efficacy measurement tool”?

          People would really do anything to justify Mozilla’s bullshit.